SFUSD sticker shock: new art school to cost $240 million

|
(13)
A still in progress rendering of the new Ruth Asawa School of the Arts high school building, on Van Ness.
Architect render via SFUSD

Art advocates have tried to move the Ruth Asawa School of the Arts high school to its new home on Van Ness street since 1987. Last night the dream moved one step closer, the only barrier is cost. 

At a packed San Francisco Board of Education meeting, planners revealed the move’s sticker price, and it’s a big one: $240 million. Board of Education President Rachel Norton’s face sunk into one hand as she heard the news.

“There’s a big challenge going forward,” said David Goldin, chief facilities officer of the San Francisco Unified School District.  “I don’t want to minimize that challenge for one minute. But for the first time in a long time, we’re close to having an architectural reality.” 

The school is named for one of its founders, artist Ruth Asawa, with deep roots in San Francisco history as an arts and education activist. It has a unique education model: students attend academic classes in the morning, but spend two hours every afternoon learning a specific art discipline. 

SotA is currently housed at the old McAteer campus on Twin Peaks, with its sister school, the Academy of Arts and Sciences (disclosure: I taught students video editing at SotA as a contractor until last summer). Collectively they have 1,000 students enrolled.

The cost of moving the school to the site on Van Ness is steep for a number of reasons, SFUSD spokesperson Gentle Blythe told us. SotA’s new home was formerly the High School of Commerce, and was granted historic landmark status -- meaning the facade, at the very least, must be preserved. The building needs a seismic retrofit as well. 

A student, an SFUSD arts advocate, the school's principal and Ruth Asawa's son talk about the need for a new SotA site. 

Most importantly, though, the cost is so high because the new site would be crafted with the arts in mind.

“It’s a high school for the performing arts with non-standard design considerations, including height of ceiling, and sophisticated electronics,” Blythe said. The building will be crafted for dance studios, orchestra rooms, multimedia facilities and more. It’s also not just a school: the district would also build an on-site auditorium that could seat 47,000 attendees. 

For comparison, the new Willie Brown Middle School comes is budgeted at $55 million, Blythe told us. But the chief facilities officer said the price to move SotA was comparable to the cost of newer public arts schools in the US. 

San Francisco artists came out in force to advocate for the move. First up to the podium to speak was the music director of the San Francisco Orchestra, Michael Tilson Thomas. 

“I’m 10,000 percent behind this idea,” he told the board. “My dream is to do a Big Brothers Big Sisters program with all the grades, to share that vision with younger people.”

Outside the meeting he told the Guardian that he said it was a “strong possibility” there’d be a formal program for students to work directly with the orchestra were SotA to move to Civic Center.

Many more artists and politicians came up to the podium: from the San Francisco Opera, the San Francisco Ballet, an artist from the Mission, Susan Brown (Willie’s daughter), HOPE Director Bevan Dufty, former City Attorney Louise Renne, and Board of Supervisors President David Chiu.

Former students spoke as well.

“I’ve had some time the past couple minutes to reflect on my time in high school, given the amount of teachers and former mentors in this room,” said Alexander Jones, a class of 2011 graduate of SotA. “It was an experience that shaped who I am today, and shaped who I am in the world. I can’t wait for a future when SotA is a shining beacon of hope.” 

He now studies dance at The Juilliard School, in New York.

SFUSD Superintendent Richard Carranza made a promise that history would not repeat itself -- if the move is approved, the school will be built quickly. “It’s our intent that this will not languish for 20 years,” he said. “It’s our intent that this will be a reality in a very short time frame.”

Still, despite the love for SotA on display, $240 million is a steep bill. The school has $25 million total on hand for the project, Chief Facilities Officer David Goldin said. San Francisco voters approved a bond for $15 million to build the school in 2003, but it’s sat there unused ever since.

At the meeting, the commissioners answered a question staring everyone in the face: Why did moving the school take so long?

“The price tag was so high, and we got scared, and we put it in the drawer. It was in a time when money was scarce. It wasn’t the time,” Commissioner Hydra Mendoza McDonald said to the crowd. 

The commissioners also said the remaining costs would likely not come from the school district.

“It’s probably going to take a ton of private money,” Commissioner Sandra Lee Fewer told the Guardian in a phone interview. “I don’t know what the fund raising plan is yet. I think we’re figuring that out now.”

The Board of Education will vote next Tuesday whether or not to build a new home for the Ruth Asawa School of the Arts.

Comments

Posted by Guest on Jan. 09, 2014 @ 1:05 am
Posted by Guest on Jan. 09, 2014 @ 7:42 am

This would be a center of excellence you moron.

Posted by Guest on Jan. 12, 2014 @ 1:18 am
Posted by Guest on Jan. 12, 2014 @ 4:34 pm
wow

$240M? I certainly hope that Sandra Lee Fewer is correct that this is going to be private money**. The crummy public schools are a major reason why a lot of people I know leave the City once they have a kid. Spending $240M of public money on a campus like this when there are so many other problems in the district would be obscene.

** charity is bourgeouis- Steven Jones

Posted by guestD on Jan. 09, 2014 @ 8:28 am
Posted by Guest on Jan. 09, 2014 @ 9:16 am

Yeah, great job, because there really isn't enough contempt going around for what remains of San Francisco's working class without you calling its public school kids losers. Let's just invest a few thousand on a few cops and some barbed wire to keep them locked in their asbestosy buildings so they don't get close enough to get that poor smell on us. Once the techie influx does enough breeding, we can spend $240 million on a private school and fill it with kids who are guaranteed to bootstrap themselves. Because that's how progress works.

Posted by Guest on Jan. 12, 2014 @ 9:36 am

Investing in our dimmest isn't going to give us much payback

Posted by Guest on Jan. 12, 2014 @ 6:01 pm

I hope San Francisco taxpayers get a chance to voice their opinion on this $240 Million waste of money. Spend a few million dollars on the existing McAteer school and call it a day. Why give up on the McAteer School, it's one of the newer schools in San Francisco and most likely meets current seismic building codes!

Posted by Guest on Jan. 10, 2014 @ 12:00 am

As a senior currently studying at SoTA I can assure you the building is obscenely crowded, provides no natural light and they've already funded a few million simply into clearing the asbestos out of our ventilation system, and no, that is not an exaggeration.
Our stage has holes in it where the leg of a piano fell through last month, as well as the fact that the orchestra pit fills up with rain water over the weekend and poses a huge safety hazard and that isn't even touching on the acoustics in the theater which rivals the cushioning of most professional recording studios and is seriously ill suited for our classical voice program.
The only reason our campus is earthquake safe is on account of the type of rock beneath the structure, the entire thing is a concrete nightmare with very few exits or wheelchair accessible points.
Despite all of this I love this campus as it holds some of my fondest memories but it is not a place befitting the talent and dedication being put out by SoTA. The students, teachers and city deserves a better representation of youth in the arts; we're San Francisco for gosh sake we're better than all that.

Posted by Guest on Jan. 11, 2014 @ 8:51 pm

Ruth Asawa SOTA is a great school.

But the price is a little steep.

Posted by Guest on Jan. 10, 2014 @ 6:59 pm

Let's not forget that the BOE already blew millions of dollars that were earmarked for SOTA's move over a decade ago.

Posted by Guest on Jan. 13, 2014 @ 8:07 am

Is there an extra zero in that article - an auditorium that would seat 47,000 attendees?

That would surely put a heavy load on transit - Muni and BART.

Posted by Guest on Jan. 15, 2014 @ 5:09 pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Also from this author

  • Poll says SF loves tech buses, doesn't ask Spanish speakers

  • Boom for whom?

    Why isn't San Francisco's hot economy creating a budget surplus to address its costly byproducts?

  • A fine dilemma

    Increased citations often hinder homeless youth from finding better life