SF school board to consider minimum wage proposal tonight amid union battles UPDATED

|
(25)
Courtesy of Matt Haney's Facebook page

Update [6/25]: The minimum wage proposal won, and is now part of SFUSD's approved budget. "There will be a larger conversation in August when I introduce the new minimum wage policy," Matt Haney, of the Board of Education said. Read the article to get some context on SFUSD's minimum wage struggles.

Hundreds of San Francisco Unified School District employees stand to finally be paid San Francisco's minimum wage, in a new proposal expected for tonight's Board of Education meeting.

Matt Haney, a board commissioner, plans to propose requiring SFUSD to pay San Francisco's minimum wage. He said it's a practical move that also carries a message.

"It's a relatively small amount of people, but a dollar fifty or two dollars more an hour is not pocket change for them," he told the Guardian. "It's really a step towards aligning the school district towards paying everyone a living wage."

As a state entity, the SFUSD need only adhere to the state minimum wage of $9 an hour, which will be the state's new minimum wage starting July 1. For now, San Francisco's minimum wage is $10.74 an hour, though that may change under a new November ballot measure to as much as $15 an hour by 2018.

Haney is considering introducing a new resolution in August to match the City's $15 minimum wage hike, as well.

Over 800 SFUSD workers earn below San Francisco's minimum wage. These employees are mostly unrepresented by unions, Haney told us, and though they serve in a variety of positions, most are yard monitors who oversee recess in the city's over 100 schools.

Haney's minimum wage proposal is part of the overall SFUSD proposed 2014-15 budget, which the school board will vote on tonight. As Governor Jerry Brown's new funding mechanism, the Local Control Funding Formula, drives extra dollars into disadvantaged school districts, the unions and schools are expected to put on the pressure for the district to offer raises for teachers and paraprofessionals.

"There should be some fireworks, I imagine," Haney said.

Negotiations between the school district and the unions are at a standstill, sources tell us. The district said it is proposing a 8.5 percent increase over three years, which amounts to an approximate $1.83 an hour raise for paraprofessionals. This offer infuriated the United Educators of San Francisco, who allege that is still not a living wage.

"They're coming to us and saying 'this is almost the best we can offer,'" Dennis Kelly, president of UESF told the Guardian. "What the hell does that mean?"

Paraprofessionals often work in special education or early childhood education, and some are security aides. There are between 1,350 and 1,500 of those employees at any given time in the district, Kelly told us, noting they're also a group made up largely of minorities and women.

In a statement to the press, SFUSD Superintendent Richard Carranza said the district made the best offer it could under the circumstances.

"We are committed to providing salary increases this year and in the future as long as the revenues from the state continue to grow," Carranza wrote. "Unfortunately the state’s forecast for school budgets just got a lot worse. Governor Brown just said that he is now expecting districts to pay a bill, in the amount of several billion dollars, to cover the State’s unfunded pension liabilities as soon as next school year and every year after for the foreseeable future. This expenditure will spend a significant amount of the very same revenues we are counting on to provide services for our students and salary increases for our employees."

As the district struggles with its bills, the paraprofessionals are facing the very real rising costs of living in San Francisco. The average pay for a paraprofessional is $25,000, Kelly told us, adding "you're employing 1,000 of these people at poverty wages."

The UESF will take a vote to authorize a strike vote in August, and the negotiations between the UESF and the school district is expected to be mediated soon.

In the meantime, for 800 or so employees at least, Haney's minimum wage increase should bring some much-needed good news to a school district beleaguered with money woes. Though the raise would only bump employees a dollar fifty or two dollars an hour more, Haney said, "it's a symbolic in some ways, but important."

And as a school district that mostly serves poor and disadvantaged students, Haney added, "if anyone should know about poverty in schools, it's us."

Correction: An earlier version of this story inaccuately cited the district's wage offer. The Guardian apologizes for the error.

Comments

bunch of insiders and vested interests?

Posted by Guest on Jun. 24, 2014 @ 6:07 pm

But, but, but... think of the children!

Posted by Guest on Jun. 24, 2014 @ 7:22 pm

What about the other people such as plummers,painters,engineers,carpenters who have not seen a raise in 6yrs. Other city tradesman and women make 12% more than SFUSD TRADESPEOPLE.... How is this even possible? They both do the exact same job,go thru the same process and have the same qualifications..

Posted by Guest easy on Jun. 24, 2014 @ 7:31 pm
Posted by Guest on Jun. 25, 2014 @ 5:54 am

does not mean one is educated. A quick mind and an advanced degree does not equal wisdom.

Posted by Guest on Jun. 25, 2014 @ 9:25 am
Posted by Guest on Jun. 25, 2014 @ 9:44 am

it is the outcome of the decision or policy

Posted by Guest on Jun. 26, 2014 @ 11:37 am

Without that then "X is wise" is identical to "I agree with X".

Posted by Guest on Jun. 26, 2014 @ 12:32 pm

outside the SFUSD.

Posted by Guest on Jun. 25, 2014 @ 6:33 am

standards. Tinkering with pay scales will not make anyone more efficient or less uncompetitive.

Posted by Guest on Jun. 25, 2014 @ 6:48 am

How about you outsource yourself?

Posted by marcos on Jun. 25, 2014 @ 7:07 am
Posted by Guest on Jun. 25, 2014 @ 7:34 am

Because theoclassical economic antidemocratic theory.

Posted by marcos on Jun. 25, 2014 @ 7:54 am
Posted by Guest on Jun. 26, 2014 @ 5:55 am

The half-wit makes a joke!

Posted by lillipublicans on Jun. 26, 2014 @ 8:58 am

will rise to 11.20 or so (4%) w/o current ballot measure on Jan 1, 2015.

Posted by Guest on Jun. 25, 2014 @ 7:33 am

If the previous game is too adventurous for you, simply try flapping
a blanket in the air above your ferret as if you were
fluttering a bed sheet over a mattress. Not once did we take into consideration the cost of these dragons.
Most ferrets are easily trained to use a litter box and it helps if it is kept in the
same place in their cage or in the corners of your "ferret room".

Posted by crimsonchilla on Jul. 09, 2014 @ 5:30 am

School districts are increasingly asked to choose between...
Funding Pensions
Certified Teacher Wages
Non-Certified Staff Wages
Part-time cross-walk and hall monitor staffs.

Bringing these part-time minimum wage workers in line with the City of SF will increase the cost of these workers by more than 50%. That will need to come from somewhere - from the other worker's wage increases. And don't screed about "tax the Corporations and the 1%" - that is just hot air.

Posted by Richmondman on Jun. 25, 2014 @ 10:24 am

even though the taxpayers clearly are not interested in writing them a blank check.

The truth is that we probably need to cut employee pay and benefits if the current model is ever to be sustainable.

Posted by Guest on Jun. 25, 2014 @ 10:33 am

On the other hand, at least this is a real issue - unlike his BIG measure to let kids wear hats (even if they provide gang affiliations)!

Posted by Richmondman on Jun. 25, 2014 @ 10:25 am

To clarify, the dress code change gave school sites the ability to make decisions on dress code themselves, including on hats, by lifting an outdated top-down, districtwide ban on hats. Schools can still ban hats, with "gang" colors, if they choose to do so. They just have to determine the policy in an inclusive way with the voices of parents, teachers, and students taken into consideration. It was hardly a "big" measure. It passed after very limited debate on the Board, little time spent on it, and no opposition from other Board members.

Posted by Matt Haney on Jun. 25, 2014 @ 12:45 pm
Posted by Guest on Jun. 25, 2014 @ 12:59 pm

Apparently.

Posted by Matt Haney on Jun. 25, 2014 @ 1:15 pm
Posted by RiseGog on Jun. 30, 2014 @ 10:04 am
Posted by RiseGog on Jun. 30, 2014 @ 10:05 am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.